<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WSS Hosting: Strike one against WH4L</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidschrag.com/schlog/238/wss-hosting-strike-one-against-wh4l/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidschrag.com/schlog/238/wss-hosting-strike-one-against-wh4l</link>
	<description>From the mind of David Schrag</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:12:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Schlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hosted SharePoint: A provider comparison</title>
		<link>http://davidschrag.com/schlog/238/wss-hosting-strike-one-against-wh4l/comment-page-1#comment-4158</link>
		<dc:creator>The Schlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hosted SharePoint: A provider comparison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidschrag.com/schlog/238/wss-hosting-strike-one-against-wh4l#comment-4158</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t see a clear winner in the table above. If you think you&#8217;ll have a lot of users but disk space isn&#8217;t an issue, then Mail2Web&#8217;s offering looks most attractive. If space is more of an issue, though, 1&amp;1 offers the best $/GB ratio (but see update below). The Webhost4life Business plan seems to offer a good compromise between the two (but see this update). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t see a clear winner in the table above. If you think you&#8217;ll have a lot of users but disk space isn&#8217;t an issue, then Mail2Web&#8217;s offering looks most attractive. If space is more of an issue, though, 1&amp;1 offers the best $/GB ratio (but see update below). The Webhost4life Business plan seems to offer a good compromise between the two (but see this update). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

