<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Schlog &#187; Telephony</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidschrag.com/schlog/categories/technology/hardware/telephony/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidschrag.com/schlog</link>
	<description>From the mind of David Schrag</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:14:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Maybe Response Point needs a second look</title>
		<link>http://davidschrag.com/schlog/343/maybe-response-point-needs-a-second-look</link>
		<comments>http://davidschrag.com/schlog/343/maybe-response-point-needs-a-second-look#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Schrag</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telephony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidschrag.com/schlog/343/maybe-response-point-needs-a-second-look</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft Response Point was announced sixteen months ago. Today &#8212; maybe! &#8212; it&#8217;s worth checking out. As I noted last November, the initial release of Response Point had a very 1.0 feel to it and was lacking many features already present in competing phone systems. Just this week at Microsoft&#8217;s Worldwide Partner Conference, Microsoft announced [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/responsepoint/default.aspx" target="_blank">Microsoft Response Point</a> was <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2007/mar07/03-19MSResponsePointPR.mspx" target="_blank">announced</a> sixteen months ago. Today &#8212; maybe! &#8212; it&#8217;s worth checking out. As I noted <a href="http://davidschrag.com/schlog/265/report-from-response-point-training" target="_blank">last November</a>, the initial release of Response Point had a very 1.0 feel to it and was lacking many features already present in competing phone systems. Just this week at Microsoft&#8217;s Worldwide Partner Conference, Microsoft announced the release of Response Point <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=402CDC7C-700C-4B97-A47F-2442E06F90EE&amp;displaylang=en" target="_blank">Service Pack 1</a>.</p>
<p>Take a look at some of the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/responsepoint/features-software-SP1-download.aspx" target="_blank">features</a> included in this service pack. The question I had after reviewing the list was why anyone would have bought a system that didn&#8217;t have these features to begin with. Who wants a phone system that doesn&#8217;t have &#8220;easy transferring, parking, and dialing?&#8221;</p>
<p>Unfortunately, this product simply adds credence to the theory that one should never buy any Microsoft product before its first service pack is released. On the other hand, Microsoft history suggests that Response Point 3, whenever they get to it, will dominate the market.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fdavidschrag.com%2Fschlog%2F343%2Fmaybe-response-point-needs-a-second-look&amp;title=Maybe%20Response%20Point%20needs%20a%20second%20look" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://davidschrag.com/schlog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidschrag.com/schlog/343/maybe-response-point-needs-a-second-look/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report from Response Point Training</title>
		<link>http://davidschrag.com/schlog/265/report-from-response-point-training</link>
		<comments>http://davidschrag.com/schlog/265/report-from-response-point-training#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Schrag</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telephony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidschrag.com/schlog/265/report-from-response-point-training</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m writing to you today from a Microsoft Response Point training session. Response Point is a phone system intended for businesses with up to 50 users. Although Microsoft supplies the software, you don&#8217;t actually buy a Response Point system from Microsoft. You buy a hardware bundle from one of their authorized manufacturers. Currently, there are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m writing to you today from a <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/responsepoint/default.mspx" target="_blank">Microsoft Response Point</a> training session. Response Point is a phone system intended for businesses with up to 50 users. Although Microsoft supplies the software, you don&#8217;t actually buy a Response Point system from Microsoft. You buy a hardware bundle from one of their authorized manufacturers. Currently, there are only two manufacturers building Response Point hardware: <a href="http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=571" target="_blank">D-Link</a> and <a href="http://www.syspine.com/" target="_blank">Quanta/Syspine</a>. A third (Aastra) is coming into the program next year.</p>
<p>My quick take on the system, based on less than three hours of experience:</p>
<ul>
<li>Compared to what was on the market a few years ago, this looks great. It has a ton of features available that previously cost much more to purchase and configure.</li>
<li>Compared to what is on the market today, it looks so-so. There are many, many choices today for small business Voice over IP phone systems. The core feature sets are all pretty much the same. They all give you voicemail, voicemail to e-mail, call transferring, call forwarding, auto-attendant and directory services, ability to use either PSTN (traditional) or VoIP carriers for outside lines, and so forth. Response Point has some neat features that others may not, particularly in the area of voice recognition and Outlook integration, but it also has some limitations. For example, if you are using PSTN lines you are limited to a maximum of 8 concurrent outside calls. Also, if I understood what the instructor was saying correctly, there is only one VoIP carrier for external calls that Response Point supports, and that carrier happens to be <a href="http://get.live.com/messenger/WinLiveCall" target="_blank">Microsoft</a>. Response Point was really designed with <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/robertbrown/archive/2007/03/18/response-point-small-business-telephone-system.aspx" target="_blank">analog phone service in mind</a>.</li>
<li>Response Point definitely has a &quot;1.0&quot; feel to it. In fact, even though the product was <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2007/mar07/03-19MSResponsePointPR.mspx" target="_blank">announced almost eight months ago</a>, the first units won&#8217;t be shipped to customers until later this month. Some important decisions (like whether there will be an extra charge for future software upgrades) seem not to have been made yet.</li>
<li>Although you might expect a Microsoft product designed for small business to have all kinds of integration features with Microsoft Small Business Server, it doesn&#8217;t. There is a little administrative plug-in to the SBS management console, but there&#8217;s no direct integration between user accounts in SBS and user accounts in Response Point.</li>
</ul>
<p>In the coming months, you are going to see a LOT of small business IT <a href="http://davidschrag.com/schlog/editorials/information-technology-consultant-contractor-or-vendor" target="_blank">consultants, contractors, and vendors</a> starting to provide phone system advice and services. My recommendation to a small business today looking for a phone system would be to find a company that has been working with telephony for at least a year or two and is familiar with many if not all of the options out there. If you&#8217;re getting advice from someone who&#8217;s just gotten into the field, you&#8217;ll probably be speaking with someone who&#8217;s partnered up with one particular manufacturer and is trying to sell that particular system wherever they can. </p>
<p>I have to advise a client on selecting a phone system this month, and I&#8217;m going to be speaking with many, many people before making a recommendation. But I do know one thing: I&#8217;m not going to recommend Response Point.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fdavidschrag.com%2Fschlog%2F265%2Freport-from-response-point-training&amp;title=Report%20from%20Response%20Point%20Training" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://davidschrag.com/schlog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidschrag.com/schlog/265/report-from-response-point-training/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

