Are whipping and spanking sex? Are they immoral?
28th August 2007
My college classmate and one-time tenant Michael Pahre writes an excellent neighborhood blog. Tonight he informs me that there was a “dungeon” right down the street from me. Its “mistress” and her husband (the master?) were arrested last week for, according to the Allston-Brighton Tab, “sexual conduct for a fee and allowing a premise to be used for immoral purposes.” I guess those are the official terms for prostitution and running a whorehouse in Massachusetts.
After reading the story, my first thought was naturally “how come nobody invited me to the grand opening?” But I am intrigued by the description of the events leading up to the arrest:
Police began investigating [Kara] Rogers when an undercover officer responded to a craiglist ad on Aug. 21 that said “Gorgeous Mistress available to meet submissive men.”
The officer and Rogers reportedly exchanged e-mails before setting up an appointment over the phone. On Thursday, Aug. 23, the officer went to the building, where a tall blond woman dressed in a sheer robe, lingerie and high heels motioned for the officer to come inside an apartment, police said. The officer was brought into a living room that contained several sex toys and rope, police said.
The woman, who identified herself as “Mistress Gorgeous,” reportedly said to the officer, “So you want to be tied? Well, I can do that with a little spanking, what else do you like?” After negotiating the price of $175 for a half-hour, the officer asked if he would receive oral sex as well, reports state. When Rogers said no, the officer left the apartment.
When arrested, Rogers reportedly said she didn’t think she was doing anything wrong, because there was no sexual contact.
I actually think Mistress Gorgeous may have a point. It certainly can’t be against the law simply to cause pain to another consenting adult. If it were, there would be no such thing as a personal trainer. Suppose the services consisted solely of foot massages or verbal humiliation. Services such as these might well elicit a sexual response from some customers, but that’s by no means a certainty. Seems to me that if there’s no exposing, much less touching, of the genitals, there’s no sex. And if there’s no sex for money, I don’t know what other standard you use to determine if someone’s purposes are “immoral.”
This could be an interesting case.
Posted in Public Policy | No Comments »